A question of democracy

England is the only nation in the UK without its own parliament

Scotland has Holyrood. Wales has the Senedd. Northern Ireland has Stormont. England — home to 56 million people — has a constitutional gap that has never been addressed since devolution in 1999. This site makes the civic case for putting that right.

Read the case
1707
Last year England had its own Parliament — abolished by the Acts of Union
56m
People in England with no dedicated devolved legislature
1999
Devolution granted to Scotland, Wales & N. Ireland — England excluded
3 of 4
UK nations with their own parliamentary voice. England is the exception

The democratic deficit

MPs from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland can vote on laws that affect only England — from health to education — while English MPs have no reciprocal say on devolved matters. This asymmetry is the West Lothian question, and it remains unanswered.

Local elections, national noise

Local democracy should be about roads, refuse, housing and schools. Instead it has become a barometer for Westminster. Without a distinct English voice, every local ballot is subsumed into national politics — and local issues go unresolved.

National identity — properly understood

This is not about English supremacy or separatism. It is about a structural paradox: England's demographic weight dominates Westminster, yet England has no voice of its own. That is unfair to England — and equally unfair to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The constitutional case

Yes, this is about national identity — but not in the way you might think

This site does not shy away from the word nationalism. But English nationalism, properly understood, is not about supremacy or separatism. It is about a paradox at the heart of the current settlement that damages everyone in the union.

England accounts for 84% of the UK population. Westminster is, in practice, the English Parliament — yet England has no voice of its own. That is unfair to England, but it is equally unfair to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The devolved nations are governed domestically by their own parliaments, but remain subject to a Westminster institution that is simultaneously England's de facto legislature. English demographic weight shapes UK-wide decisions that affect the devolved regions — from fiscal frameworks to immigration — without any democratic counterbalance.

When Tony Blair's government devolved powers in 1999, it was widely acknowledged that England's position was anomalous. Successive governments have tinkered — most recently with "English Votes for English Laws" in 2015, a procedural sticking plaster that was quietly abandoned in 2021. The West Lothian question, first posed in 1977, remains unanswered.

The solution is not to diminish England. It is to give England a parliament of its own — so that Westminster can finally become what it was always meant to be after devolution: a genuine federal chamber for the whole union.

A Confederation model — how it would work
Westminster (reconstituted) Defence, foreign policy, macro-economics, inter-regional oversight
English Parliament Health, education, housing, policing, local governance — for England
Holyrood · Senedd · Stormont Same domestic competencies for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland

This is not a novel idea. It is how Germany, Australia and Canada are governed — four equal national legislatures beneath one federal body with defined, limited powers. Democratic parity: not English dominance, and not English invisibility. But the for UK, a Confederation would serve us better.

Crucially, this settlement would reduce the pressure for Scottish independence and Welsh separatism. The grievance that drives those movements is, in large part, the dominance of English interests at Westminster. Remove that dominance — by giving England its own parliament — and the union gains the democratic legitimacy it has lacked since 1999.

Read the full case